Monthly Archives: January 2011

New app for iPhone; iLaugh. This had me literally in tears for an hour, I had to read it twice.

For all of us out there that are too lazy to really x out all the auto-correct errors that the folks at Apple have generously supplied us on our iPhones.  In this era of iEverything it is helpful to reflect on the absurdity of life as reflected by the ailing Jobs and the wonderful humor his company has unwittingly created.  Enjoy your friday, even if it IS a foggy day in California.



Dy – This is how I feel about FaceBook selling my face to the Russians!

Facebook wants to put you in an ad.

The Palo Alto social-networking giant on Tuesday introduced a new advertising program called Sponsored Stories, which can potentially turn the millions of “likes,” check-ins and other actions shared by its nearly 600 million members into revenue-producing advertisements.

The company already has 13 advertisers lined up, including Coca-Cola, Levi’s and Amnesty International.

In one example, a company video explained that when members now use Facebook Places to say they are visiting a Starbucks outlet, their friends see that post and have the ability to comment.

But under the new ad program, if Starbucks sponsored all such check-ins to their coffee shops, friends would also see another version of the same post on the right side of their pages, where targeted ads already appear.

That ad would have a “Sponsored Story” label at the top and include the logo and a link to the Starbucks page on Facebook. The ads give the regular check-in more visibility and make sure it doesn’t drop out of view as quickly as it might in the regular feed.

There are similarities between Sponsored Stories and Twitter Inc.’s Promoted Tweets, which highlights a specific Twitter topic if it is sponsored by an advertiser.

Promoted Tweets are already “gaining traction” in the advertising world, according to eMarketer Inc., an online research firm that previously projected the privately held Facebook’s ad revenue will grow to about $4 billion this year, up from $1.8 billion in 2010.

Facebook has been testing Sponsored Stories for several months and found they helped with brand identification and retention.

Of course, when Facebook members write about the food they enjoyed at a particular restaurant or click “Like” about a movie they’ve seen, it’s in effect an advertisement for that eating place or film.

Indeed, word-of-mouth product endorsements “have value to users and are valuable to marketers as well,” said Jim Squires, a member of Facebook’s product marketing team.

Squires said all regular privacy settings apply, so a Sponsored Stories ad wouldn’t appear to anyone who wouldn’t have seen the regular status update. The advertiser can’t edit the message, although Facebook members can’t choose to completely opt out of becoming part of an ad except to delete the original post.

Analyst Ray Valdes, a vice president of Web services for research firm Gartner Inc., said Facebook will have to make sure turning status updates into ads doesn’t alienate members or cause a privacy backlash as the company has generated in the past when introducing features.

“If there happens to be a whiff of spam in the content added by Facebook to that social interaction, then there can be negative repercussions,” Valdes said. “For example, a person may find that they lose friends if their status messages consistently have commercial overtones.”

And Valdes questioned what happens if a check-in includes a negative message against the advertiser or if Facebook members stop checking in to avoid the ads.

“User participation and user engagement is the goose that potentially lays golden eggs, so Facebook has to be careful with that goose,” he said.

Valdes said Sponsored Stories is “too limited a mechanism to form a major revenue stream for Facebook, but over time it could be one component of their revenue mix.”

And Facebook could find value in the consumer data and analysis of how its members are interacting, he said.

Read more:


Watch out for repetitive web-words that you should watch out for while watching out for…

Google Says Search Quality Improved With New Spam Detection

Jan 21, 2011 at 12:00pm ET by Barry Schwartz

SpamMatt Cutts, a Google engineer working on search quality, wrote at the Google Blog that Google has recently released a new spam detection classifier to help prevent “spammy on-page content” from ranking highly in the Google search index. None of this comes as a surprise, Matt told us Google would be stepping up their search quality efforts in 2011.

The new classifier was introduced based on Google seeing a “slight uptick of spam in recent months,” said Cutts. Matt Cutts did say that spam compared to five-years ago is at rates “less than half” as of now, but in the recent months, there has been a slight increase in spam impacting Google’s results.

The redesigned document-level classifier will specifically make it harder for on-page spam to impact Google’s search index. Matt Cutts explained, “the new classifier is better at detecting spam on individual web pages, e.g., repeated spammy words—the sort of phrases you tend to see in junky, automated, self-promoting blog comments.”

In addition, Google also has “radically improved” their methods of detecting hacked sites and they are “evaluating multiple changes that should help drive spam levels even lower, including one change that primarily affects sites that copy others’ content and sites with low levels of original content,” said Cutts.

In addition, Matt said Google will pay even more attention to “content farms,” which are sites that have low-quality content. Google introduced, what SEOs named, May Day update, which was Google’s first stab at low-quality content sites. So be prepared, if you are a site that aggregates content and repurposes it, you might be hit by whatever Google releases in 2011. Matt Cutts and Google vows to take “even stronger action on content farms and sites that consist primarily of spammy or low-quality content.”

For more information, see the Google Blog and related stories on Techmeme.

Related Stories:


Tags: , , , , , , ,

Launch of .jobs Web sites shakes up employment advertising industry

(re-posted courtesy of Carla Mays)
By Ian Shapira
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, January 21, 2011

A massive network of employment Web sites – where any company can list job openings for free – launched this week over the protests of newspapers and online recruitment companies, who fear billions of dollars in lost revenue.

The 40,000 sites, with Web addresses that all end in “.jobs,” have the potential to upend companies such as and, which just a decade ago set up for-profit jobs classifieds online that roiled the media companies that printed the listings on paper. The initiative is being backed by nearly 600 hundred industry titans such as Google, American Express, IBM, Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Martin.

Finding jobs on the sites is simple: A nurse looking for work need only type in For someone looking for a job in the District, there’s It works for scores of professions, and in every state, any U.S. city with more than 5,000 people, and 126 countries. Later this year, suburbs and small towns will be tossed in, too, and the network is expected to grow to 100,000 Web sites.

The new sites are operated by a nagging rival to Monster: the Indianapolis-based nonprofit DirectEmployers Association, whose executive director is Bill Warren, 69, a former Monster president whom Monster sued unsuccessfully after he left in 2000, he said.

In an interview, Warren pointed out what he views as hypocrisy by the online recruiters who fought the existence of his new venture: “Back in the 1990s, when we put the first employment site on the Internet, some of the people who are now protesting – Monster and CareerBuilder – were very happy and dancing on the graves of newspapers. But now, something like this is going to have an impact on them, and obviously, they’re not so happy. This is an evolution of Internet recruiting.”

Matthew Henson, a Monster spokesman, declined to comment.

All this potential upheaval was made possible by a nonprofit called the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, which was created during the Clinton administration to run the Internet’s address naming system.

The .jobs domain was approved five years ago, but only for corporate names such as or Last month, ICANN gave final approval to DirectEmployers Association to add a twist: search-friendly professions and geographic locations. The new flexibility caters more directly to how users search for jobs online, according to experts.

For-profit competitors vociferously complained to ICANN that the new leeway would harm their brands and business models.

“I think [these new jobs sites] are going to be a formidable challenge,” said Peter Weddle, executive director of the International Association of Employment Web Sites, which last year fought the approval of the new .jobs Web sites, and whose members include major newspapers as well as Monster and CareerBuilder. “ICANN is a small organization with a lot of influence, but with nobody overseeing its application over the rules.”

Craig Schwartz, ICANN’s chief registry liaison, rejected those accusations. ICANN’s board of directors includes international executives from the private and nonprofit sectors, including a former Department of Homeland Security official, an IBM official and a former European Parliament member, according to ICANN’s Web site.

“I don’t agree that we’re not accountable to anyone. We’re accountable to the global Internet community and its stakeholders,” Schwartz said. “That’s why it takes a lot of time to process new rules. It’s the nature of our global governance structure.”

Major corporations, particularly those who are among the 580 major corporations that pay dues to the DirectEmployers Association, say the .jobs sites will shake the online recruitment industry. The association’s members, which pay an annual fee of $15,000, enjoy perks on the sites such as getting their job openings placed at the top. Warren said he did not rule out the possibility that non-members could pay a fee for high-priority placement in the future.

“Of all the solutions you hear of, this is the one you think has the most viable solution moving forward. This will have a profound effect on the jobs-list industry,” said a senior recruiting executive for a top Fortune 500 technology company, who was not authorized by his bosses to speak publicly. Monster costs about $400 per job. “The traditional job-board model is so pricey, especially in these economic times. We have to invest in the future.”

Randy Goldberg, vice president for recruiting for the Hyatt hotel chain, which has several hotels and about 1,000 employees in the Washington region, said the new .jobs sites have an appealing Web model but will need to prove themselves.

“It all depends on whether candidates realize that the dot-jobs domain is out there and utilize it,” he said. “The advantage of Monster and CareerBuilder is branding. And as long as people still go there, we’ll still need to participate there.”

“But this has the potential to be a game-changer,” he added.

Goldberg said the key advantage of the .jobs sites is that employers can directly post all of their openings for free on one universal network of sites, and can ensure that none of those positions have been filled.

Goldberg said he often can’t post all of Hyatt’s available jobs on Monster or CareerBuilder because the fees are too expensive; and that some free sites such as or often post expired listings. “From a candidate’s perspective, to know that I can go to to be able to see a true clean list of all the jobs within that category, that’s powerful,” he said.

Peter M. Zollman, founding principal of the AIM Group, an interactive media consultant firm, said the new sites cater to how people search for jobs these days. “The reality is that lots of people are now accustomed to using search engines and search engine strings to find a job rather than going to the traditional job boards,” said Zollman, whose dozens of clients include Monster, The Washington Post and “If you have built a jobs board for nurses called, and now these guys come along to start, there’s a big risk. It could change the whole way people search and find jobs. ”

That kind of scenario is exactly what the International Association of Employment Web Sites fears.

“This is an economic recovery killer,” said Weddle. “It’s going to infringe on the trademarks and undermine thousands of small businesses who have spent the last 15 years serving job seekers very well.”

Click here to read the original article.



Tags: , , , , , , ,

Do not, I repeat do not, look at the elephant in the room.

I never cease to be amazed at man’s propensity to overlook that which is staring him in the face.  Ever look for your glasses only to find them on your forehead?  How about the one where you walk around the office looking for your keys only to find them in your hand, or finding out that the girl who has been your “best friend” through your last tragic relationships is actually in love with you?

There was such an “ah ha” moment yesterday at the Bay office.

Having implemented several new accounts in the past couple of weeks, it seemed like a good idea to back up the whole system on our external drive.  Not being a huge office set up with an IT provider, I still have to do this manually.  Needless to say it had been a while.

The hard drive had accumulated a serious amount of dust, but all 500Gigs were still there waiting to be refreshed.  I booted the thing up, connected the USB cord, got all comfortable and hunkered in for my 2 hours of finding something else to do (like take a real long lunch and a walk) while it did it’s thing.  One can never trust the thing to just set it up, hit go, and leave for the day.  Oh no, there is always just one last prompt one forgets that will wait for ya until you show up the next morning.

So I dove in just before lunch.  The thing asked me for prompt after prompt, then went blank.  I repeated the processes, so did the drive.  I uninstalled the software and tried to find it on the web to re-install it.   Running diagnostics on the drive, a serial number and model number were produced.  This didn’t check out with the numbers for an external drive, and after many troubleshooting and FAQ inquiries it seemed insurmountable so tech support was finally called in.

The next half hour was spent negotiating with the nice man in Bangalore regarding the fact that the drive was no longer supported (it was, after all, over a year old and therefore obsolete) therefore this call was not free.  Next up was registering the product, which was always put off when you buy the thing because you needed it right away or you wouldn’t have bought it.  The serial numbers that came up on the computer were that of an internal drive.  The obvious:  the internal drive on the computer happened to be manufactured by the same company.  Duh.

Now the actual numbers on the external drive itself were written in some cryptic microscopic font that required literally three sets of reading glasses stacked one on top of the other so they could be read.  Having entered the now correct serial numbers, and registering the product, and updated my status (paid more) as the “free trial” for the product that I had never used was now expired, we were ready to download and install the software.  This took a half hour.  Then the “backing up” commenced.  There were no queries as to what was to be backed up, it just took off and started backing.

I checked on it dutifully for almost three hours, and was finally feeling an exhilarating triumph when it was announced “backup complete.”  This exaltation was short lived when it was discovered that the offending external drive backup program that has now cost me roughly 6 hours and $50 only backed up 26G out of the 57G on the drive.  Back to square one.

Then I heard that giant popping sound of my head leaving my backside.

I formatted the drive, wiping everything off of it, went to the “backup” utility that appears when the C-Drive Icon is right clicked, and hit ENTER.  The entire C-Drive copied itself on my external drive just as if it were a memory stick.  It took 5 mins to set up, and was there the whole time.  DUH.

How many “answers” in business can you think of that were sitting on your desk the whole time?


Tags: , , , , , , ,

Timing rewards

by Seth Godin

We can agree that promising a three-year old a new car when she graduates from college is probably an ineffective way to get her to stop sucking her thumb.

As we mature, it gets easier to trade satisfaction now for a prize later. However, the more risk involved in getting the prize, the less we value it. Frequent flyer miles, for example, began with the promise that if you flew an airline regularly for months (or even years) you’d get a free flight. The airlines oversold the miles and undelivered on the free flights, though, so the reward started to lose its perceived value–too much risk that you wouldn’t get the prize you wanted. Many of the frequent flyers I know have ceased to ‘save up’ and now use their miles for upgrades, moving the benefit closer in time.

One of the many things the web is changing is our focus on now. It’s increasing. Offering a reward in three months just isn’t going to cut it. If you want me to get out of bed or brush my teeth or click on your link, there better be something waiting for me on the other side.


Tags: , , , , , , ,

Ready, fire, aim! Can we sell it now?

It’s great to get excited.

Are we there yet dad?  How much longer? I have to pee.

OK, so I don’t encounter the last one too often in my marketing endeavors, but the first two – all the time.  It is understandable, and kind of heartwarming in a way, to see the interest grow as a project comes together.

Many of the people we work with are seeing the potential of their web presence for the first time.  It’s like a kid stepping onto the lot of Disneyland for the first time after an 8 year bus ride.  The first thing they want to do is run around and scream, then go ride the Matterhorn.  The screaming takes the form of “let’s get this to market NOW.”  The Matterhorn takes the form of their biggest business obstacle, or most elusive prospect.

Hold your proverbial horses, Kemosabe!  Although many improvements in a website and infrastructure are possible in a short period of time, the error should always go to the Uber-prepared.  There is far more to having a website ready to promote than “fixing up” the homepage and loading a few other pages with keyword optimized content.

There is a list of promotions that have to be stockpiled, articles written and stockpiled, landing pages created for promotions, more keyword copy inserted into the website pages, email lists to be scrubbed, ad campaigns written, analytic script inserted in the proper HTML code…  you get the idea.

It kind of feels like Ebenezer Scrooge reigning in on Tiny Tim (the CEO)’s marketing Christmas morning, but damn Sam, there is still lots to do before we want to go “live.”  No sense taking the stage before you put your dress on.

If you find yourself in the situation described above, take a few deep breaths.  Proper planning and scheduling can avert the one thing you hope to never have to ask for, and probably won’t be granted by most prospects:  a second chance.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,970 other followers

%d bloggers like this: